Originally posted on-Wednesday, May 16, 2007
SOMETHING THE MSM DOESN'T WANT US TO KNOW ABOUT
I accidentally stumbled onto these articles;
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/003131.php
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/015634.php
I will be visiting the web site;
http://www.jihadwatch.org/
more often as I would like to find out what is going on in the world when it comes to terrorism and obviously the msm is to busy being p.c. to honestly report what is going on, or perhaps they are afraid of the terrorists and what they might do if the truth is reported. In any case the articles (some of them) appear to be a bit more honest, but watch out for the comments as they are not the best. I don't think I will be reading the comments anymore myself.
Monday, May 28, 2007
Friday, May 18, 2007
STOP BY AND VOTE, THEN CALL/E-MAIL A SENATOR
Just a short note-A.O.L. has a short article about the new immigration "reform" bill. you know, the amnesty bill for illegal aliens, the one that would allow a fast track to citizenship for illegal aliens-including those like the terrorists in new jersey that were here illegally (some were but not all). anyways, I did not read much of the article because it was pretty much garbage as were the pictures of the"illegal alien" protestors (hmmm, how long do you think they'll keep themselves draped in american flags once they manage to steal their citizenship? NOT) anyways, A.O.L. also has a poll about whether people approve of giving "z visas" (amnesty) to illegal aliens at present the poll was running at 70% NO. I would encourage everyone to stop by and vote "NO" so we can increase that percentage as much as possible. Also, stop by hughhewitt.com so you can get information on how to call or e-mail Republicans to let them know you don't want that bill passed.
Just a short note-A.O.L. has a short article about the new immigration "reform" bill. you know, the amnesty bill for illegal aliens, the one that would allow a fast track to citizenship for illegal aliens-including those like the terrorists in new jersey that were here illegally (some were but not all). anyways, I did not read much of the article because it was pretty much garbage as were the pictures of the"illegal alien" protestors (hmmm, how long do you think they'll keep themselves draped in american flags once they manage to steal their citizenship? NOT) anyways, A.O.L. also has a poll about whether people approve of giving "z visas" (amnesty) to illegal aliens at present the poll was running at 70% NO. I would encourage everyone to stop by and vote "NO" so we can increase that percentage as much as possible. Also, stop by hughhewitt.com so you can get information on how to call or e-mail Republicans to let them know you don't want that bill passed.
Friday, May 04, 2007
TRY THE "END AROUND" IT WORKS IN FOOTBALL (SOMETIMES)
I have heard on the radio (recently) that the Oregon legislature has passed a flaw-oops I mean "law"-handing the same benefits to homosexuals, lesbians and "domestic partners" as those who have a monogamous legal marriage between one man and one woman. By doing so they have managed to open the can of proverbial worms with this act that is akin to a school superintendent pushing through his pet program. I make that analogy because like that school superintendent they have chosen to directly ignore what has plainly been said by the people of their state (can anyone say-"vote and definition of marriage? sure I knew you could..."), and like that school superintendent they ass-u-me that because of their "vast knowledge" and training (and because of the pressures or money of interest groups-along with their own personal preferences) they have chosen to do whatever they wish. Also like that school superintendent this flaw will effect our society and is an attempt at social engineering. But, lets set this analogy aside as well as the moral issues involved in this decision. Instead let's take a small peek at the can of worms that has been opened.
First, what the legislature has done is take the first step toward negating the definition (one man and one woman) of marriage altogether.
Second, this might seem far fetched but if the Oregon legislature succeeds in overiding the peoples vote then what is to stop them when another special interest group begins to push their agenda onto the wonderfully weak-kneed legisalture?
Third, with this comes an exceeding abundance of social problems, e.g. what happens to a business when a Muslim employee decides that he wants his wives and children to be placed on his medical coverage? After all, if marriage is no longer a monogamous realtionship between one man and one woman then a Muslim or a Mormon would have every right to demand that their spouses and children be placed on their medical coverages. Otherwise they could claim discrimination on the basis of religion. I am sure that businesses would love that.
It appears that the Oregon legislature (with their blatant disregard for what the people want) have reenacted that old Greek myth in which an extremely curious woman opens a box and frees a plethora (ooh big word) of woes upon the world...her name was Pandora.
I have heard on the radio (recently) that the Oregon legislature has passed a flaw-oops I mean "law"-handing the same benefits to homosexuals, lesbians and "domestic partners" as those who have a monogamous legal marriage between one man and one woman. By doing so they have managed to open the can of proverbial worms with this act that is akin to a school superintendent pushing through his pet program. I make that analogy because like that school superintendent they have chosen to directly ignore what has plainly been said by the people of their state (can anyone say-"vote and definition of marriage? sure I knew you could..."), and like that school superintendent they ass-u-me that because of their "vast knowledge" and training (and because of the pressures or money of interest groups-along with their own personal preferences) they have chosen to do whatever they wish. Also like that school superintendent this flaw will effect our society and is an attempt at social engineering. But, lets set this analogy aside as well as the moral issues involved in this decision. Instead let's take a small peek at the can of worms that has been opened.
First, what the legislature has done is take the first step toward negating the definition (one man and one woman) of marriage altogether.
Second, this might seem far fetched but if the Oregon legislature succeeds in overiding the peoples vote then what is to stop them when another special interest group begins to push their agenda onto the wonderfully weak-kneed legisalture?
Third, with this comes an exceeding abundance of social problems, e.g. what happens to a business when a Muslim employee decides that he wants his wives and children to be placed on his medical coverage? After all, if marriage is no longer a monogamous realtionship between one man and one woman then a Muslim or a Mormon would have every right to demand that their spouses and children be placed on their medical coverages. Otherwise they could claim discrimination on the basis of religion. I am sure that businesses would love that.
It appears that the Oregon legislature (with their blatant disregard for what the people want) have reenacted that old Greek myth in which an extremely curious woman opens a box and frees a plethora (ooh big word) of woes upon the world...her name was Pandora.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)